Inhibitor of trpm-4 ion channel for treating or preventing neurodegeneration

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a compound which is effective in inhibiting the function of the TRPM4 ion channel and the use of such compound in treating or preventing a neurodegenerative disease, such as Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson&#39;s disease, Alzheimer&#39;s disease, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, in a subject. The invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a TRPM4 inhibitory compound. The invention further relates to in vitro methods for identifying pharmaceutically active compounds that are useful for treating or preventing a neurodegenerative disease.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/369,624, filedJun. 27, 2014, as the U.S. National Stage of International PatentApplication No. PCT/EP2012/076773, filed Dec. 21, 2012, each of which ishereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and which claimpriority to European Patent Application No. 11196121.5, filed Dec. 29,2011.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The sequences listed in the accompanying Sequence Listing are presentedin accordance with 37 C.F.R. 1.822. The Sequence Listing is submitted asan ASCII computer readable text file, which is incorporated by referenceherein.

FIELD

The invention relates to a compound which is effective in inhibiting thefunction of the TRPM4 ion channel and the use of such compound intreating or preventing a neurodegenerative disease, such as MultipleSclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, or amyotrophiclateral sclerosis, in a subject. The invention also provides apharmaceutical composition comprising a TRPM4 inhibitory compound. Theinvention further relates to in vitro methods for identifyingpharmaceutically active compounds that are useful for treating orpreventing a neurodegenerative disease.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) whichcause progressive loss of neuronal structure and function areparticularly devastating diseases for the affected patients and theirfamilies. Among these neurodegenerative diseases are, for example,Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease,amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and stroke. Due to the complexity ofthe CNS many of these diseases are only poorly understood to date.

One of the most common progressive neurodegenerative diseases isMultiple Sclerosis (MS). MS is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinatingdisease of the CNS and the leading cause of neurological disability inyoung adults. It affects approximately 2.5 million individuals worldwideand currently no curative treatment is available. The pathogenesis of MShas been attributed to a breakdown of T lymphocyte tolerance to CNSself-antigens resulting in chronic inflammation with subsequentdemyelination and neuro-axonal degeneration (Compston, A. and Coles A.(2008) Lancet. 372: 1502-1517). Axonal damage arises already early inthe disease, also independent of demyelination and correlates best withclinical disability during the progressive course of MS (Komek et al.(2000), Am J Pathol. 157: 267-276). Similarly, neuronal damage andatrophy of the gray matter, with a predilection for the cingulate gyms,the fronto-temporal cortices and the hippocampus, have also been shownto occur from the earliest stages and are likely to play an importantrole in clinical progression (Fisher et al. (2008), Ann Neurol. 64:255-265).

While the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to neuro-axonal injuryduring chronic inflammation of the CNS are still ill defined, it hasbeen suggested that chronic CNS inflammation is associated with anincreased oxidative stress and release of glutamate, which results inaxonal and neuronal injury by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction andincreased metabolic demand. This creates a chronic state of virtualhypoxia with ensuing changes in ion homeostasis (Frischer et al. (2009)Brain. 132: 1175-1189). Indeed, damaged and respiratory-deficientmitochondria as well as reduced ATP production can be detected inneuronal cells in MS lesions (Campbell et al. (2011), Ann Neurol. 69:481-492; Dutta et al. (2006), Ann Neurol. 59: 478-489; Mahad et al.(2009), Brain. 132: 1161-1174). In addition, glutamate receptoractivation by release of glutamate in MS lesions and experimentalautoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) inflammatory infiltrates withsubsequent Ca²⁺ overload have been shown to occur in axons and neuronsunder inflammation-induced hypoxic conditions (Pitt et al. (2000), NatMed. 6: 67-70). However, the downstream mechanisms, which are initiatedby ATP shortage and Ca²⁺ overload culminating in a sustained influx ofcations and eventually leading to neuro-axonal degeneration, remainelusive (Stirling et al. (2010), Trends Mol Med. 16: 160-170).

A major factor by which neurodegeneration in MS occurs is due to animbalanced glutamate metabolism with an increased extracellularglutamate concentration. Glutamate is released by activated immune cellsand damaged CNS cells; indeed, cerebrospinal fluid glutamate levels areincreased in relapsing-remitting MS during relapse and during clinicalprogression in secondary progressive MS (Stover et al. (1997), Eur JClin Invest. 27: 1038-1043; Sarchielli et al. (2003), Arch Neurol. 60:1082-1088). An increase in extracellular glutamate levels causesexcitotoxic neurodegeneration through ionotropic glutamate receptorssuch as NMDA- and AMPA-receptors by eliciting Ca²⁺ and Na⁺ influx.Accordingly, glutamate receptor antagonists were somewhat efficient inreducing neuro-axonal damage in EAE (Basso et al. (2008), J Clin Invest.118: 1532-1543).

The transient receptor potential channel of the melastatin subfamilyTRPM4 provides a persistent cation influx combined with gatingproperties, which are associated with alterations of energy metabolismand ion homeostasis (Guinamard et al. (2010), Physiology (Bethesda). 25:155-164). TRPM4 is a voltage-dependent Ca²⁺-impermeable cation channelwith a unitary conductance of 25 pS that is activated by a rise inintracellular calcium (Launay et al. (2002) Cell. 109: 397-407), whereasintracellular ATP inhibits TRPM4 activity and regulates TRPM4 Ca²⁺sensitivity (Nilius et al. (2005), J Biol Chem. 280: 6423-6433).Further, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate and hydrogen peroxide(Simon et al. (2011), J Biol Chem. 285: 37150-37158) remove TRPM4channel desensitization during Ca²⁺ stimulation. Channel opening leadsto the conduction of monovalent cations with Na⁺ as the main chargecarrier (Launay et al. (2002), Cell. 109: 397-407). TRPM4 is expressedin different tissues including the heart, arteries, gastrointestinaltract and immune system. It controls T cell, dendritic cell and mastcell activation or migration through regulating membrane depolarizationand Ca²⁺ homeostasis. Pathologically, TRPM4 has been associated withhypertension, secondary hemorrhage after spinal cord injury, hyper-IgEsyndrome and cardiac conduction dysfunction (Mathar et al. (2010), JClin Invest. 120: 3267-3279; Gerzanich et al. (2009), Nat Med. 15:185-191; Kruse et al. (2009), J Clin Invest. 119: 2737-2744). Trpm4 mRNAwas found to be present in brain tissue, and a suggestive TRPM4-mediatedcurrent was recorded in the brain stem (Mironov (2008), J Physiol. 586:2277-2291). Inhibition of TRPM4 has been suggested to preventprogressive hemorrhagic necrosis after spinal cord injury (US2010/0092469 A1). Expression of the TRPM4 ion channel was up-regulatedin capillary epithelial cells after spinal cord injury, leading tocapillary leakiness and failure of capillary integrity. However,functional neuronal expression and a contribution of TRPM4 toneurodegeneration in diseases like MS have thus far not been shown orotherwise suggested.

The present inventors surprisingly found that TRPM4 is expressed inneuronal somata and axons in mice suffering from Experimental AutoimmuneEncephylomyelitis (EAE) and in MS lesions of human patients. Inaddition, it could be demonstrated that TRPM4 is directly involved inmediating neuronal-axonal degeneration under neuroinflammatoryconditions, such as in MS. Moreover, the present application providesevidence that inhibitors of the TRPM4 channel protein are capable ofpreventing neuro-axonal injury in the inflamed CNS without affecting theencephalitogenic immune response.

The present invention therefore provides a new and widely applicabletherapeutic strategy for preventing neurodegeneration in a number ofdifferent diseases and conditions which are known to be associated withneurodegeneration, amongst others, Multiple Sclerosis.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is amongst other things based on the insight thatblocking the TRPM4 ion channel confers resistance of axons and neuronstowards hostile challenges which results in neuro-axonal preservationand less clinical disability and neurodegeneration. Therefore, thepresent invention specifically contemplates to use antagonists and/orinhibitors of the TRPM4 ion channel for treating a neurodegenerativedisease by preventing neuronal loss in a subject. Compounds thatinterfere with the function of the TRPM4 ion channel have beenextensively described in the art. However, the use of such compounds fortreating a neurodegenerative disease has not yet been suggested.

Thus, in a first aspect the invention relates to a compound which iseffective in inhibiting the function of a TRPM4 ion channel for use in amethod of treating or preventing a neurodegenerative disease in asubject. More specifically, the invention relates to such an inhibitorycompound for use in a method of preventing neuronal damage and/or lossin a subject suffering from a neurodegenerative disease. As used herein,the “function of a TRPM4 ion channel” means the capability of theprotein to regulate the influx of ions into the cell, in particular theinflux of cations such as Nat Accordingly, a “functional” TRPM4 ionchannel refers to a channel protein that effectively regulates theinflux of ions, such as Na⁺, into the cell The present invention ishence useful for treating or ameliorating the effects ofneurodegenerative diseases which are associated with TRPM4-mediatedcytotoxicity.

The compounds of the present invention effectively prevent damage and/orloss of neurons in the nervous system (NS) of a subject, preferably inthe central nervous system (CNS) of a subject. As used herein, the NS isto be understood as being composed of the CNS and the peripheral nervoussystem. Further, as used herein, the CNS is to be understood ascontaining the brain and the spinal cord. In a preferred embodiment, thecompounds of the invention are administered for preventing damage and/orloss of neurons in the brain. In a further embodiment, progressivedamage and/or loss of neurons may be halted by administration of thecompounds of the invention. Halting the damage and/or the loss ofneurons means that the pathological processes of the neurodegenerativedisease which finally result in damage and/or loss of neurons arestopped or at least reduced.

The neurodegenerative disease to be treated or prevented according tothe invention may be any known neurodegenerative disease, preferably onethat is associated with inflammation. As used herein a neurodegenerativedisease is a non-traumatic, disease which is associated with theprogressive loss of functional neurons in the NS, preferably the CNS.The neurodegenerative disease to be treated according to the inventionmay be caused by a genetic predisposition. Conditions of the NS elicitedtraumatic events and/or physical shock, such as traumatic brain injury,cerebral ischemia, hypoxia and edema are not understood asneurodegenerative diseases in the sense of the present invention.

Further, it has been found that TRPM4 signalling contributes toglutamate excitotoxicity which has devastating effects in a large numberof neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, the compounds, methods anduses of the present invention will be particularly useful in thetreatment of neurodegenerative diseases which have been associated withglutamate excitotoxicity.

Thus, according to a preferred embodiment, the neurodegenerative diseaseto be treated or prevented according to the invention is known to beassociated with glutamate excitotoxicity. As used herein, glutamateexcitotoxicity refers to a process that results in damaging or killingneuronal and/or axonal cells by excessive stimulation of these cells byglutamate and other substances that are capable of activating theglutamate receptor. Thus, glutamate excitotoxicity occurs as a resultfrom overactivation of glutamate receptors. For example, theneurodegenerative disease known to be associated with glutamateexcitotoxicity may be selected from the group Multiple Sclerosis (MS),such as relapsing remitting MS or secondary progressive MS, Parkinson'sdisease, Alzheimer's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In aparticularly preferred embodiment, the neurodegenerative disease is MS.

Inhibitory compounds

The compounds of the present invention are pharmaceutically activecompounds which are effective in decreasing the expression and/or theactivity of the TRPM4 ion channel protein. The compounds can include alldifferent types of organic or inorganic molecules, including peptides,polypeptides, oligo- or polysaccharides, fatty acids, steroids, and thelike. Typically, the compounds will be small molecules with a molecularweight of less than about 2,500 daltons, less than 2000 daltons, lessthan 1500 daltons, less than 1000 daltons, or less than 500 daltons. Ina particularly preferred embodiment of the invention the compounds whichinhibit the function of TRPM4 ion channel have a molecular weight ofless than about 500 daltons.

Preferably, the compounds of the present invention are able to cross theblood-brain barrier, i.e. they are blood-brain barrier-permeable. Thismeans that the compounds are able to reach a site in the brain which isaffected by neuronal injury and/or loss. Inhibitory compounds with amolecular weight of below 500 daltons are particularly suitable, sincethey are often able to cross the blood-brain barrier, or their transportacross the blood-brain barrier is achieved by other means, such as bytransporters or by hydrophobic stretches in the compound which allowdiffusion across the blood-brain barrier.

The compounds contemplated by the invention affect the function of aTRPM4 ion channel protein. In a preferred embodiment, the inhibitorycompounds interfere with the human TRPM4 ion channel protein. In thecontext of the present invention, the terms “TRPM4 ion channel” or“TRPM4” refer to the calcium-activated transient receptor potentialmelastatin 4 cation channel. TRPM4 belongs to the family of transientreceptor potential cation channels, and more specifically to thesubfamily M of this family of cation channels. The human TRPM4 proteinoccurs in two different isoforms that are depicted in SEQ ID NO:1(NP_060106) and SEQ ID NO:2 (NP_001182156).

Preferably, the compounds contemplated by the invention inhibit thefunction of an TRPM4 ion channel having an amino acid sequence asdepicted in SEQ ID NO:1 (NP_060106) or an amino acid sequence having atleast 90% sequence identity to the sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 (NP_060106).In a further preferred embodiment, the compounds contemplated by theinvention inhibit the function of an TRPM4 ion channel having an aminoacid sequence as depicted in SEQ ID NO:2 (NP_060106) or an amino acidsequence having at least 90% sequence identity to the sequence of SEQ IDNO:2 (NP_001182156). Further isoforms of the human TRPM4 protein whichretain the ion channel activity may also be inhibited by the compoundsof the present invention.

The compounds which are contemplated herein for treating and/orpreventing a neurodegenerative disease are effective in inhibiting thefunction of the TRPM4 ion channel. This means that the compoundseffectively reduce the extent of membrane current that occurs due to theinflux of cations upon opening of the channel. In a preferredembodiment, the compound decreases the TRPM4 ion channel activity by atleast 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 95% compared tothe activity in the absence of the compound. In a particularly preferredembodiment, the inhibitory compound blocks the TRPM4 ion channel, i.e.the channel is completely deactivated so that there is no detectableinflux of cations, such as Nat The compounds preferably act byinteracting with or binding to the TRPM4 protein, thereby preventing thesterical changes in the channel protein that occur upon opening of thechannel, e.g. in response to an increase in the intracellular Ca²⁺concentration. Compounds that actively bind to TRPM4 may bind to theextracellular, the intracellular or the transmembrane part of the TRPM4ion channel protein.

Preferably, the inhibitory compound is specific for the TRPM4 ionchannel, i.e. the compound inhibits the expression and/or activity ofthe TRPM4 ion channel, while it does essentially not inhibit theexpression and/or activity of other proteins or enzymes, e.g. other ionchannels. As a result of the TRMP4 specificity, the compounds accordingto the invention elicit no or only tolerable side effects whenadministered to a subject.

The subject to be treated with the inhibitory compound will normally bea mammal, and preferably is a human. Generally, the subject can be ofany age. The subject preferably suffers from a neurodegenerativedisease, more preferably from a progressive neurodegenerative disease.The subject may be in any stage of the disease, i.e. the disease may bein an early stage wherein the subject shows only the first pathologicalsigns that are normally associated with said disease, or the subject maybe in a late stage of the disease. The subject to be treated may have agenetic or other predisposition for developing a neurodegenerativedisease in the future.

The TRPM4-inhibitory compound of the invention can be derived fromdifferent groups of molecules. For example, TRPM4-inhibitory compoundscan include antisense polynucleotides which bind to the gene encodingthe TRPM4 ion channel and block transcription, RNA processing and/ortranslation of said gene. The antisense molecules can be RNA or DNAmolecules. Also, the TRPM4-inhibitory compound of the invention can be aRNA molecule which exerts its effect by RNA interference. Examples forsuch compounds are RNAi molecules and siRNA molecules that are capableof blocking translation of the TRPM4-encoding mRNA. Alternatively, theTRPM4-inhibitory compound of the invention can be a ribozyme thatcleaves the TRPM4-encoding mRNA. Other classes of molecules which maygive rise to suitable TRPM4-inhibitory compounds include peptides,antibodies and antibody fragments. Peptides that bind and interfere withthe TRPM4 channel protein may be conveniently screened in random peptidelibraries.

A number of inhibitors of TRPM4 have been described in the art. Forexample, nucleotides such as ATP, ADP, AMP, AMP-PNP, and adenosine havebeen described to inhibit the TRPM4 ion channel quickly and reversibly.Similarly, polyamines like spermine have also been found to block TRPM4currents (Nilius et al. (2004), Eur J Physiol. 448: 70-75).

Other compounds that have been described to inhibit the TRPM4 ionchannel are those referred to in WO 2006/034048 and WO 03/079987. Thesecompounds include antagonists to sulfonylurea receptor-1 (SUR1), such as9-phenanthrol, glibenclamide, tolbutamide, repaglinide, nateglinide,meglitinide, midaglizole, LY397364, LY389382, glyclazide, glimepiride,estrogen, and estrogen-related compounds (such as estradiol, estrone,estriol, genistein, non-steroidal estrogen, phytoestrogen, zearalenone,and the like). The above compounds can be substituted or otherwisemodified at one or more sites, as long as these modifications do notsubstantially impair the TRPM4-inhibitory effect of the compounds and donot result in any undesired toxic side effects.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the TRPM4-inhibitorycompound for use in treating or preventing a neurodegenerative diseaseis 9-phenanthrol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate,tautomer or ester thereof. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable saltsof 9-phenanthrol include hydrochlorides and sulphates. 9-phenanthrol isa metabolite of phenanthrene, and the IUPAC name is phenanthren-9-ol.The structure of 9-phenanthrol is as follows:

The above structure can be substituted or otherwise modified at one ormore sites, as long as these modifications do not substantially impairthe TRPM4-inhibitory effect of 9-phenanthrol and do not result in anyundesired toxic side effects. For example, one or more hydrogen atoms ofthe C—H bonds of the heterocyclic ring system can be substituted withhalogen atoms, such as chlorine, bromine or iodine atoms. Further, thehydrogen of the C—H bonds can also be replaced by an alkyl group, suchas methyl, ethyl or propyl.

In another particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, theTRPM4-inhibitory compound for use in treating or preventing aneurodegenerative disease is glibenclamide or a pharmaceuticallyacceptable salt, solvate, tautomer or ester thereof. Examples ofpharmaceutically acceptable salts of glibenclamide include in particularhydrochlorides and sulphates. Glibenclamide has been described as amodulator of ATP binding cassette proteins (ABC transporters). The IUPACname for glibenclamide isN-(4-[N-(cyclohexylcarbamoyl)sulfamoyl]phenethyl)-2-methoxybenzamide. Ithas the following structure:

The person skilled in the art will understand that the structuredescribed above can be substituted or otherwise modified at one or moresites, as long as these modifications do not substantially impair theTRPM4-inhibitory effect of glibenclamide and do not result in anyundesired toxic side effects. For example, one or more hydrogen atoms ofthe C—H bonds of the heterocyclic ring system can be substituted withhalogen atoms, such as chlorine, bromine or iodine atoms. Further, thehydrogen of the C—H bonds can also be replaced by an alkyl group, suchas methyl, ethyl or propyl.

Pharmaceutical Compositions

The TRPM4-inhibitory compound of the present invention as describedabove will normally be provided in the form of a pharmaceuticalcomposition which also comprises one or more excipients, carriers and/ordiluents which are suitable for the intended way of administration.Generally, the compound may be administered in any suitable form thatdoes not interfere with its TRPM4-inhibitory activity. The preferredroute of administration will depend inter alia on the location of theneurodegeneration to be treated. For example, the compound may beadministered orally in the form of tablets, capsules, granule, powder,liquids, and the like. Alternatively, the TRPM4-inhibitory compound maybe formulated for being administered parenterally, e.g. by intravenousinjection or intravenous infusion. In a preferred aspect, theTRPM4-inhibitory compound is administered to the subject by intravenousinfusion, more preferably by short-term infusion within less than 60min, e.g. within 30 min, 20 min or 15 min.

Compositions suitable for injection and/or infusion include solutions ordispersions and powders for the extemporaneous preparation of suchinjectable solutions or dispersions. The composition for injection mustbe sterile and should be stable under the conditions of manufacturingand storage. Preferably, the compositions for injection and/or infusionalso include a preservative, such as a chlorobutanol, phenol, ascorbicacid, thimerosal, and the like. For intravenous administration, suitablecarriers may comprise physiological saline, bacteriostatic water,Cremophor EL™ (BASF) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Sterilesolutions for injection and/or infusion can be prepared by incorporatingthe TRPM4-inhibitory compound in the required amount in an appropriatesolvent followed by filter sterilization.

The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention will comprisean amount of the TRPM4-inhibitory compound that is effective to inhibitthe TRPM4 ion channel, thereby reducing the extent of neurodegenerationby protecting the NS, preferably the CNS, from neuronal loss. Thetherapeutically effective amount of the TRPM4-inhibitory compound to beadministered will depend on several parameters, such as the mode ofadministration, the particular neurodegenerative disease to be treated,the severity of the disease, the history of the disease, the age,height, weight, health, and physical condition of the individual to betreated, and the like. A therapeutically effective amount of theTRPM4-inhibitory compound can be determined by one of ordinary skill inthe art without undue experimentation given the disclosure set forthherein.

The TRPM4-inhibitory compound will preferably be administered to asubject in an amount that ranges from 0.1 μg/kg body weight to 10,000μg/kg body weight, e.g. from 0.5 μg/kg to 7,500 μg/kg body weight, from1.0 μg/kg to 5,000 μg/kg body weight, from 5.0 μg/kg to 3,000 μg/kg bodyweight, from 7.5 μg/kg to 2,500 μg/kg body weight, from 10 μg/kg to2,000 μg/kg body weight, from 25 μg/kg to 1,500 μg/kg body weight, from50 μg/kg to 1,000 μg/kg body weight, from 100 μg/kg to 800 μg/kg bodyweight, from 300 μg/kg to 600 μg/kg body weight, and more preferablyfrom 400 μg/kg to 500 μg/kg body weight.

Apart from the TRPM4-inhibitory compound, the pharmaceutical compositionprovided by the present invention may further comprise otheranti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory compounds which are commonlyused in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as interferonbeta-1a, interferon beta-1b, fampridine, fingolimod hydrochloride,natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, or mitoxantrone. Where theTRPM4-inhibitory compound is used in combination with anotheranti-neurodegenerative agent, the two active ingredients can beadministered to the subject in the form of a single pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising both agents and pharmaceutically acceptableexcipients and carriers. Administration of such a pharmaceuticalcomposition will automatically result in a simultaneous administrationof both agents. Alternatively, the two therapeutic agents may also beadministered separately from each other, i.e. in the form of twoseparate pharmaceutical compositions, one containing theTRPM4-inhibitory compound, and the other containing the additionalanti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory agent. The two separatecompositions can be administered simultaneously, i.e. at the same timeat two distinct sites of administration, or they may be administeredsequentially (in either order) to the same site or to different sites ofadministration.

Preferably, both the composition comprising the TRPM4-inhibitorycompound and the composition comprising the secondanti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory agent are administeredaccording to a weekly dosing regimen, more preferably a regimen in whicha single dose of the TRPM4-inhibitory compound and a single dose of theanti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory agent is administered everyweek for a treatment period of 2 or more weeks, for example, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or more weeks.Preferably, the treatment period comprises at least 12 weeks. It willalso be possible to administer the overall weekly dose of theTRPM4-inhibitory compound and/or the anti-neurodegenerative oranti-inflammatory agent in more than one administration per week, e.g.in 2 or 3 administrations per week. In a preferred embodiment, theamount of the TRPM4-inhibitory compound to be administered weekly isdelivered as a single intravenous infusion per week, and the amount ofthe anti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory agent to be administeredweekly is also given as a single intravenous infusion per week, eitherat the same day of administration of the TRPM4-inhibitory compound, e.g.within about 10 minutes to about 6 hours after administration of theTRPM4-inhibitory compound has been completed, more preferably withinabout 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 or 240 minutes, or at any of days2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 of the week.

For example, a combination therapy with the above-mentioned agents thatis based on a weekly dosing regimen begins on day 1 of a treatmentperiod, and a first therapeutically effective dose of theTRPM4-inhibitory compound is administered at that day. A firsttherapeutically effective dose of the additional anti-neurodegenerativeor anti-inflammatory agent can be administered either on the same day,e.g. simultaneously or within about 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 or240 minutes after administration of the TRPM4-inhibitory compound.Alternatively, the additional anti-neurodegenerative oranti-inflammatory agent can be administered at any of days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6or 7 of the first week. At day 8, a second therapeutically effectivedose of the TRPM4-inhibitory compound is administered accompanied orfollowed by the second administration of the additionalanti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory agent. The skilled personwill readily be able to design other administration regimens which aresuitable for the delivery of the combined active ingredients.

In vitro Screening Methods

The insight that a decreased expression of the TRPM4 gene and/or adecreased activity of the TRPM4 cation channel prevents or haltsneurodegenerative disease in the NS, preferably the CNS of a subjectallows the design of screening assays which identify pharmaceuticallyactive compounds which are effective in preventing or haltingneurodegenerative disease in the NS, preferably the CNS, of a subject.

In a further aspect, the present invention therefore provides methodsfor identifying a pharmaceutically active compound that could be usedfor treating or preventing neurodegenerative diseases. The methods ofthe present invention can therefore be used for drug screeningapproaches that aim to identify new pharmaceutically active for treatingdiseases, such as Alzheimer's disease or MS.

Accordingly, the invention relates to an in vitro method for identifyinga pharmaceutically active compound for treating or preventing aninflammatory, neurodegenerative disease in a subject, comprising

(a) contacting a candidate compound with a functional TRPM4 ion channel;

(b) detecting whether said candidate compound interferes with thefunction of the TRPM4 ion channel;

wherein a compound which inhibits the function of the TRPM4 ion channelis suitable for treating or preventing said inflammatory,neurodegenerative disease. The neurodegenerative disease is preferablyone that is associated with glutamate excitotoxicity. More preferably,it is selected from the group consisting of MS, Parkinson's disease,Alzheimer's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, wherein MS isparticularly preferred.

A decrease in the activity of the TRPM4 ion channel, i.e. in itscapability of regulating cation influx, may be determined by anysuitable assay. For example, a pharmaceutically active compound whichinhibits the TRPM4 ion channel leads to a reduction in the inwardcurrent that can be measured in whole-cell patch-clamp recordings afterthe addition of glutamate. A method suitable for detecting whether agiven candidate compound interferes with the function of the TRPM4 ionchannel is disclosed in the below Example 7. A different method couldemploy the measurement of cation-sensitive fluorescent probes, whichwere previously loaded into the respective cells.

In an alternative approach, the screening can target compounds whichinterfere with TRPM4 transcription and/or translation. In theseembodiments, an in vitro method is provided for identifying apharmaceutically active compound for treating or preventing aninflammatory, neurodegenerative disease in a subject, comprising

(a) contacting a candidate compound with a cell that expresses afunctional TRPM4 ion channel;

(b) detecting whether said candidate compound decreases thetranscription of the TRPM4 gene and/or the translation of the TRPM4mRNA;

wherein a compound which decreases the transcription of the TRPM4 geneand/or the translation of the TRPM4 mRNA is suitable for treating orpreventing said inflammatory, neurodegenerative disease. Again, theneurodegenerative disease is preferably a disease that is associatedwith glutamate excitotoxicity. More preferably, it is selected from thegroup consisting of MS, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, andamyotrophic lateral sclerosis, wherein MS is particularly preferred.

Screening methods which monitor the transcription of the TRPM4 geneand/or the translation of the TRPM4 mRNA are particularly useful, e.g.for identifying compounds which inhibit the TRPM4 ion channel bydecreasing TRPM4 expression. By use of these methods, it will forexample be possible to identify compounds that target transcriptionfactors which are relevant for TRPM4 expression. Also, suitableribozymes or antisense DNA molecules can be identified in this way.

A number of different screening methods to evaluate the effects ofcandidate compounds on gene expression or enzyme activity may be used.The methods of the invention make use of any suitable method to detect adecrease in the expression level of the TRPM4 ion channel gene and/or inthe activity of the TRPM4 ion channel. Suitable methods include e.g.biochemical or cellular methods. The skilled person would be able toidentify such methods with his or her common knowledge.

For example, a decrease in the expression level of the TRPM4 ion channelgene may be detected by methods which allow the quantification of thetranscription or the translation product of the TRPM4 ion channel gene,e.g. the quantification of TRPM4 mRNA or protein. Such methods are wellknown in the art. For example, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-basedmethods, such as standard PCR, real-time PCR and quantitative real-timePCR, or Northern Blots may be used to determine the concentration of theTRPM4 mRNA. The concentration will be determined relative to a samplewhich is not contacted with the respective candidate compound, i.e.relative to a negative control, or to the same sample before contactingit with the respective compound. The concentration of TRPM4 protein mayanalogously be determined with standard methods such as SDS-PAGE, enzymelinked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), Western Blots, mass spectrometry orany other suitable means. The TRPM4 protein concentration will then becompared to a sample which has not been contacted with the respectivecompound or to the same sample before contacting it with the respectivecompound.

The cell that expresses the functional TRPM4 ion channel is preferably amammalian cell, more preferably a human cell. The cell can be derivedfrom a cell line, preferably a neuron- or brain cell-derived cell line,or from a primary cell culture, more preferably from a primary neuronalcell culture.

The in vitro methods of the present invention may preferably be carriedout as high throughput screening techniques which allow for theexamination of thousands of different compounds in a short period oftime. Candidate compounds for use in screening methods can be providedin the form of libraries which comprise a high number of synthetic ornatural compounds. High throughput screening techniques are described indetail in the prior art. The compounds identified by the screeningmethods may be validated in animal models, such as mouse models toconfirm their activity in vivo.

The candidate compounds used in the screening methods of the presentinvention can include all different types of molecules as described forthe compounds of the present invention above.

The TRPM4 that is used in the above assays can be recombinantlyexpressed. Accordingly, it will be understood by the skilled person thatthe above assays can be performed not only with the specific sequencesdepicted in SEQ ID NO:1 and 2, but also with variants, derivatives andenzymatically active fragments of these TRPM4 sequences. As used herein,variants of TRPM4 are polypeptides that differ by one or more amino acidexchanges from the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2.Generally, any amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence shown inSEQ ID NO:1 or 2 can be exchanged for a different amino acid, providedthe resultant sequence of the variant is still capable of forming afunctional ion channel. In particular, variants for which a total of upto 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20% of the amino acids differs from the amino acidsequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2 are included. Polypeptides in whichone or more amino acids were inserted in the amino acid sequence of SEQID NO:1 or 2 are also included as variants. Such insertions can be madeat any position of the polypeptide shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2. Moreover,polypeptides in which one or more amino acids are missing in comparisonwith SEQ ID NO:1 or 2 are also considered to be variants of thepolypeptides of SEQ ID NO:1 or 2. Such deletions can apply to any aminoacid position of the sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 or 2.

Variants of TRPM4 will preferably have at least 80% sequence identity,more preferably at least 85% sequence identity, and even more preferablyat least 90% sequence identity, e.g. 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%,98%, 99% sequence identity, with the human TRPM4 ion channel proteinshown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2 when these sequences are optimally arranged,e.g. with the computer program GAP or BESTFIT using the default gapmethod. Computer programs for determination of the amino acid identityare known to the skilled person.

Enzymatically active fragments of the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2or variants thereof are to be understood to refer to peptides orpolypeptides that differ from the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ IDNO:1 or 2 or from the above-defined variants thereof by the absence ofone or more amino acids at the N-terminus and/or at the C-terminus ofthe peptide or polypeptide.

Derivatives of the polypeptides shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2 or of thevariants thereof refer to polypeptides that possess amino acids withstructural modifications, for example, modified amino acids, relative toa polypeptide shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2 or variants thereof. Thesemodified amino acids can be, e.g. amino acids that have been altered byphosphorylation, glycosylation, acetylation, thiolation, branchingand/or cyclization. It is preferred that the variants or derivatives ofthe TRPM4 polypeptide shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2 or the active fragmentsof this polypeptide or its variants retain at least 75%, and preferablyup to 80%, 85%, 90% or even up to 99% of the ion channel activity of theTRPM4 polypeptide shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or 2.

In another aspect, the invention relates to the use of: (a) apolypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1 orSEQ ID NO:2 or a variant thereof having at least 80%, more preferably atleast 90% sequence identity to the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ IDNO:1 or SEQ ID NO:2; or (b) a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide of(a) or the complement thereof for identifying pharmaceutically activecompounds for treating or preventing an inflammatory, neurodegenerativedisease. The neurodegenerative disease is preferably a disease that isassociated with glutamate excitotoxicity. More preferably, it isselected from the group consisting of MS, Parkinson's disease,Alzheimer's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, wherein MS isparticularly preferred.

DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Figure (FIG.) 1 shows that Trpm4 deletion ameliorates disease severityin EAE mice. Clinical scores (a) and body weight changes (b) for groupsof WT EAE (n=15) and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE (n=10) mice after immunization withMOG₃₅₋₅₅ are shown as mean values ±s.e.m; asterisks indicate statisticalsignificance; **P<0.01. Results from one representative experiment outof three are shown.

FIG. 2 demonstrates that Trpm4^(−/−) mice show no EAE-relevant immunesystem alterations. (a) T cell proliferation after re-stimulation insingle cell suspensions of draining lymph nodes from WT EAE (n=6) andTrpm4^(−/−) EAE (n=6) mice as assessed by incorporation of[methyl³H]-thymidine. (b, c) CNS-infiltrating cells after immunizationin WT EAE (n=4) and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE (n=3) mice: (b) total number ofisolated CD45⁺ leukocytes; (c) CNS-infiltrating leukocyte subsets. In a,b and c, data are shown as mean values ±s.e.m. of one representativeexperiment out of four. (d) Representative stainings and quantificationsof spinal cord sections of diseased animals 21 days post immunization(n=8 for WT and n=5 for Trpm4^(−/−)) for cellular infiltration (HE) andmyelin (LFB/PAS) to determine the amount of lesions and the extent ofdemyelination. (e) Clinical deficits in lethally irradiated WT andTrpm4^(−/−) mice which received bone marrow transplantations from eithergenotype (WT in Trpm4^(−/−), n=5; Trpm4^(−/−) in Trpm4^(−/−), n=6; WT inWT, n=8; Trpm4^(−/−) in WT, n=6).

FIG. 3A and 3B shows that TRPM4 is neuronally expressed in mice andhumans. (a) co-localization of TRPM4 and neuronal nuclei (NeuN) incervical spinal cord sections of healthy WT and Trpm4^(−/−) mice andimmunohistochemical stainings of TRPM4 as well as control staining inhuman spinal cord sections. (b) co-localizations between TRPM4 andphosphorylated and non-phosphorylated neurofilament H (SMI 31 and SMI32) in cervical spinal cord sections of healthy WT and in acutelyinflamed lesions of WT-EAE mice as well as TRPM4 and neurofilaments inperiplaque white matter lesions of MS patients.

FIG. 3C shows Quantitative real-time PCR of Trpm4 transcripts from WTand Trpm4^(−/−) whole brain homogenates and E16 hippocampal neuronsafter 4 weeks of culture.

FIG. 4 depicts that Trpm4^(−/−) mice show reduced axonal and neuronalloss during EAE. (a) Diseased WT and Trpm4^(−/−) animals 21 days postimmunization stained for amyloid precursor protein (APP). (b)WT-control, WT-EAE, Trpm4^(−/−) control and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE mice werestained for neurofilaments (SMI 31 and SMI 32) in the corticospinaltract and dorsal column and for neuronal nuclei (NeuN) in the graymatter of cervical spinal cord sections. Numbers of axons and somatawere counted manually and by ImageJ software. Asterisks indicatestatistical significance; *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

FIG. 5 shows that TRPM4 contributes to excitotoxic cell death in vitro.(a) Cell integrity of hippocampal neurons as measured by LDHconcentrations in supernatant of untreated cells or cells treated with0.5 μM antimycin A or 50 nM glutamate. (b) ATP levels of WT andTrpm4^(−/−) hippocampal neurons after 4 h of antimycin A or glutamateadministration. (c) Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in hippocampalneurons of E16 embryos from WT and Trpm4^(−/−) mice after 10 days inculture, under resting conditions (untreated) and after administrationof 50 nM glutamate for 2 h. Normalized current-voltage relationship. (d)The fold change in membrane capacity after 50 nM glutamate incubation ascompared to those of untreated controls of WT and Trpm4^(−/−) neurons.(e) Hippocampal neurons of E16 embryos from WT and Trpm4^(−/−) miceafter 10 days in culture. Glutamate treated and control cells werestained for their cytoskeleton by β-tubulin III. Cell volumes werecalculated. Representative pictures of neuronal cells from WT andTrpm4^(−/−) mice after glutamate incubation for 2 h. Scale bar: 30 μm.In FIG. 5a and b results are presented as mean values ±s.e.m. of fourindependent experiments; statistical analyses were performed by two-wayANOVA with Bonferonni posthoc test; asterisks indicate statisticalsignificance; *P<0.05, **P<0.01. Results in FIG. 5d, c and e are shownas mean values ±s.e.m. of two independent experiments each; asterisksindicate statistical significance of student's t-test; *P<0.05,**P<0.01.

FIG. 6 shows that glibenclamide treatment reduces clinical disabilityand neurodegeneration in EAE mice. (a) Mean clinical disability scoresfor WT-EAE and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE mice, which received daily injections ofglibenclamide or DMSO control. Treatment was started when first clinicalsymptoms occurred (day 8 after immunization with MOG₃₅₋₅₅). (b) HealthyWT mice (WT control) and WT EAE mice treated either with glibenclamideor vehicle (n=4 per group) were stained 30 days post immunization forneurofilaments (SMI 31 and SMI 32) in the corticospinal tract and dorsalcolumn and for neuronal nuclei (NeuN) in the gray matter of cervicalspinal cord sections. Numbers of axons and somata were counted by ImageJsoftware.

EXAMPLES Example 1: TRPM4 Deficiency Ameliorates Experimental AutoimmuneEncephalomyelitis (EAE)

In order to investigate whether TRPM4 modulates the pathogenesis of EAE,knockout mice with a dysfunctional Trpm4 gene (Trpm4^(−/−)) andwild-type (WT) mice were immunized with the myelin oligodendrocyteglycoprotein peptide 35-55 (MOG₃₅₋₅₅) in order to induce EAE in theseanimals. The sequence of the MOG₃₅₋₅₅ peptide used for immunization isshown in SEQ ID NO:3. Briefly, C57BL/6 Trpm4^(−/−) mice (Vennekens etal. (2007), Nat Immunol. 8: 312-320) and Trpm4^(+/+) littermates(referred to as WT controls) were immunized subcutaneously with 200μg/mouse MOG₃₅₋₅₅ in complete Freund's adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich)containing 4 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37Ra, Difco). Inaddition, 200 ng pertussis toxin (Calbiochem) was injected intravenouslyon the day of immunization and 48 h later. The mice were sex and age(6-10 weeks) matched and were scored for clinical signs every day over aperiod of 60 days by the following system: 0, no clinical deficits; 1,tail weakness; 2, hind limb paresis; 3, partial hind limb paralysis;3.5, full hind limb paralysis; 4, full hind limb paralysis and fore limbparesis; 5, pre-morbid or dead. Animals were sacrificed when theirscores reached 4 or higher. Clinical scores (FIG. 1a ) and body weightchanges (FIG. 1b ) were determined in triplicate for groups of WT EAE(n=15) and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE (n=10) mice after immunization.

Results: As can be taken from FIG. 1, TRPM4 deficiency resulted in anoverall reduced disease severity (P<0.01; FIG. 1a ) and a significantlybetter recovery from weight loss (P<0.01; FIG. 1b ) compared with WTlittermates during EAE. These results indicate a decisive role of TRPM4in mediating clinical disability in EAE.

Example 2: Analysis of Immune Cell Activation By Detecting Incorporationof [methyl-³H]-thymidine

Since EAE is an autoimmune disease and TRPM4 was previously shown tofulfil functions in immune cell activation and migration, it was firstexamined whether the protective phenotype in Trpm4^(−/−) could beexplained by altered immune cell activation or infiltration. For thispurpose, C57BL/6 Trpm4^(−/−) mice and WT controls were treated asdescribed in Example 1. For assessing T-cell proliferation, single cellsuspensions from draining lymph nodes and spleens were prepared 15 daysafter immunization from WT EAE (n=6) and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE (n=6) mice byhomogenizing the tissues through a 40 μm cell strainer (BD Biosciences).Cells were sedimented by centrifugation (300× g, 7 min, 4° C.) andsplenic red blood cells were lysed in red blood cell lysis buffer for 7min at 4° C. Cells were washed once in PBS and resuspended in buffer.The lymph node cells obtained from the immunized animals were culturedin 96-well plates (Sarstedt) at 2×10⁵ cells/well in mouse completemedium and re-stimulated with different concentrations of the MOG₃₅₋₅₅peptide or anti-CD3 (145-2C11, eBioscience). T cell proliferation wasassessed by incorporation of [methyl-³H]-thymidine as follows: After 2days, cells were pulsed with 1 μCi [methyl-³H]-thymidine (Amersham) perwell for 16 h. Cells were harvested and spotted on filtermats with aHarvester 96 MACH III M (Tomtec) according to manufacturer'sinstructions. Incorporated activity per 96-well was assessed in a betacounter (1450 Microbeta, Perkin-Elmer) in counts per minute (cpm). Thestimulation index of the applied peptides or antibodies was calculatedby dividing the mean incorporated activity of stimulated wells by themean of unstimulated control wells.

Results: The results of the [methyl-³H]-thymidine incorporation studiesare shown in FIG. 2a . It can be seen there that Trpm4^(−/−) mice showno EAE-relevant immune system alterations. Evidently, the deletion ofthe gene Trpm4 did not alter the proliferation of peripheral T cellsbeing specific for MOG₃₅₋₅₅ as analyzed by ³H-thymidine incorporationafter MOG₃₅₋₅₅ immunization.

Example 3: Analysis of CNS Infiltrates by Flow Cytometry

Since the protective phenotype observed in Example 1 could not beexplained by altered immune cell activation, CNS (brain and spinal cord)infiltrates were analyzed by flow cytometry. For the isolation ofCNS-infiltrating immune cells, WT EAE (n=4) and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE (n=3)mice were sacrificed by CO₂ inhalation and immediately transcardiallyperfused with ice-cold PBS. Brain and spinal cord were removed, mincedwith blades and digested in collagenase/DNAseI solution (Roche) for 45min at 37° C. Tissue was triturated through a 40 μm cell strainer. Thehomogenized tissue was washed in PBS (300×g, 10 min, and 4° C.). Immunecells including microglia were separated from myelin, other glia andneuronal cells by centrifugation over a discontinuous percoll (GEHealthcare) gradient. The homogenized tissue was resuspended in 30%isotonic percoll, transferred into a 15 ml Falcon tube and 78% isotonicpercoll was layered underneath. The gradient was centrifuged (1500×g, 30min, 4° C.) and CNS-infiltrating immune cells were then recovered fromthe gradient interphase. The isolated cell fraction was washed two timesin PBS and subsequently resuspended in buffer. The total number ofisolated CD45⁺ leukocytes was quantified using TruCOUNT® beads (BDBiosciences). CNS-infiltrating leukocyte subsets were identified asCD45^(int)CD11b⁺ microglia, CD45^(high)NK1.1⁺CD3⁻ NK cells,CD45^(high)NK1.1⁺CD3⁺ NKT cells, CD45^(high)L_(y) ⁻6G⁺ neutrophils,CD45^(high)CD11b⁻c-Kit⁺ mast cells, CD45^(high)L_(y)−6G−CD11b+CD11c−macrophages, CD45^(high)Ly−6G−CD11b−CD11c⁺ DC,CD45^(high)Ly−6G−CD11b−CD11c−CD3⁺ T cells andCD45^(high)Ly−6G−CD11b−CD11c−CD45R⁺ B cells (all antibodies are rat IgGexcept for CD3 and CD11c (hamster IgG) and NK1.1 (mouse IgG), all fromeBioscience except of c-Kit which was from Biolegend).

Results: Equal total numbers of CNS-infiltrating CD45⁺leukocytes (FIG.2b ) and the same subset composition of infiltrates were found inTrpm4^(−/−) and WT mice (FIG. 2c ). Of note, recruitment of dendriticcells and mast cells to the CNS was not influenced by Trpm4 deletion(data not shown). Further, numbers of FoxP3⁺regulatory or effector Tcells, expression of the activation markers CD25 and CD69 as well asinterferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-4 and IL-10 cytokineproduction by CD4⁺ T cells were not significantly altered in theperiphery (spleen and lymph nodes) or CNS. Consequently, no significantdifference with regard to the numbers of inflammatory lesions (HE) andextend of demyelination (LFB/PAS) (FIG. 2d ) as well as densities ofinfiltrates with T cells (CD3) and macrophages/microglia (Mac3) wereobserved within spinal cords at day 21 post immunization, a time pointat which the earliest significant differences in clinical disabilitybetween Trpm4^(−/−) and WT mice are observed. Also, no difference inblood-brain-barrier integrity or serum glucose levels betweenTrpm4^(−/−) EAE and WT EAE mice could be detected (data not shown).

Example 4: Bone Marrow Chimeric Mice

Finally, bone marrow (BM) chimeric mice were established byreconstituting lethally irradiated Trpm4^(−/−) or WT mice with bonemarrow from either Trpm4^(−/−) or WT mice. This was followed by anactive EAE induction in these chimeras. Bone marrow chimeric mice weregenerated by lethal whole-body irradiation (9 Gy; 1 Gy/min) using acaesium-137 gamma irradiator (BIOBEAM 2000) of 5-6-week-old recipient WTand Trpm4^(−/−) mice which were reconstituted 24 h later with 5×10⁶ bonemarrow cells derived from tibiae and femurs from respective donors. Thelethally irradiated mice received bone marrow transplantations fromeither genotype (WT into Trpm4^(−/−), n=5; Trpm4^(−/−) into Trpm4^(−/−),n=6; WT into WT, n=8; Trpm4^(−/−) into WT, n=6). In addition to WT andTrpm4^(−/−) cells, BM cells from CD45 congenic C57BL/6 Ly5.1 mice(CD45.1) were transferred into irradiated C57BL/6 WT mice (CD45.2) andassessed reconstitution (>95%) by FACS analysis of peripheral bloodcells of mice 6 weeks after grafting. After recovery of the recipientsfor 6 weeks, the mice were actively immunized with MOG₃₅₋₅₅ to induceEAE. The recipient mice were scored for their clinical deficits.

Results: The results of the reconstitution experiments are depicted inFIG. 2e . The figure shows the results from the EAE experiments as meanvalues and statistical analyses were performed by two-way ANOVA;asterisks indicate statistical significance of Trpm4^(−/−) in WT vs. WTin Trpm4^(−/−); **P<0.01; other not shown significances are: Trpm4^(−/−)in WT vs. Trpm4^(−/−) in Trpm4^(−/−), P<0.05; WT in WT vs. WT inTrpm4^(−/−), P<0.01; WT in WT vs. Trpm4^(−/−) in Trpm4^(−/−), P<0.05;Trpm4^(−/−) in Trpm4^(−/−) vs. WT in Trpm4^(−/−), n.s.; WT in WT vs.Trpm4^(−/−) in WT, n.s.; results from one representative experiment outof two are shown. It can be seen that Trpm4 deletion in donor BM did notaffect the disease course. Protection from disease was only observed inmice that received the Trpm4^(−/−) BM, but not in mice that received WTBM (P<0. 01).

Taking together the results from Examples 2-4, it is evident that theabsence of TRPM4 does not impair the activation or recruitment ofdisease-relevant immune cells during autoimmune inflammation of the CNS.It is therefore to be concluded that TRPM4 signalling within the CNSparenchyma is responsible for the altered disease course in Trpm4^(−/−)mice.

Example 5: TRPM4 Expression in Neurons and Axons

In order to understand the contribution of TRPM4 to the ameliorated EAEcourse, TRPM4 expression in the CNS of humans and mice was analyzed.

a) Preparation and Analysis of Murine Tissues

Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 100 μl per10 g of body weight of a mixture of 10 mg/ml esketamine hydrochloride(Pfizer), 1.6 mg/ml xylazine hydrochloride (Bayer) and water. Afterwardsthe animals were perfused with 0.1 M phosphate buffer and fixed with 4%paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The spinal cords wereresected and fixed for 30 min with 4% PFA and cryoprotected in 30%sucrose in PBS at 4° C. Midcervical spinal cord sections were cuttransversely at 12 μm with a freezing microtome (Leica Jung CM3000) andstored in a cryoprotective medium (Jung) at −80 ° C. Forimmunohistochemistry the sections were incubated in blocking solution(5% normal donkey serum in PBS) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 at roomtemperature for 45 min and subsequently stained simultaneously orconsecutively overnight at 4° C. with antibodies against the followingstructures: Phosphorylated neurofilaments (SMI 31, mouse IgG, 1:1,000;Covance), non-phosphorylated neurofilaments (SMI 32, mouse IgG, 1:1,000;Covance), neuronal nuclei (NeuN, mouse IgG, 1:200, Millipore) or TRPM4(rabbit IgG, 1:100, Abcam). Secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor488-coupled donkey antibodies recognizing rabbit IgG, Cy3-coupled goatantibodies recognizing mouse IgG and Alexa Fluor 488-coupled goatantibodies recognizing mouse IgG (all 1:600, Dianova). DNA was stainedwith Hoechst 33258 (Invitrogen). Control experiments with no primary orsecondary antibodies showed no staining (data not shown). Analyses ofthe sections were done with a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope. Forquantification of axonal loss multiple representative images were takenwith a 63-fold lens from the corticospinal tract and the dorsal columnand axons were counted with ImageJ software based on a minimum diameterof 6.15 μm². Threshold intensities were fixed across experimental groupsfor each type of tissue examined. Accuracy of automated countingtechnique was confirmed by manual counting of sample images. Neuronalsomata of the gray matter were counted manually.

b) Preparation and Analysis of Human Tissue

Histopathological analysis of MS tissue was performed on PFA-fixedsections from human brain biopsies of patients with MS. All tissueblocks were first classified with regard to lesional activity.Avidin-biotin technique with 3,3-diaminobenzidine was used for thevisualization of bound primary antibodies. For fluorescenceimmunohistochemistry, MS biopsies were consecutively incubated withantibodies recognizing antigens in axons (neurofilament, mouse IgG1,Clone 2F11, Dako). Bound antibodies were visualized with species andimmunoglobulin subtype specific secondary antibodies (Cy2 anti-mouse IgGfrom Jackson ImmunoResearch and Alexa555 anti-mouse IgG1 fromInvitrogen). Counterstaining of cells was performed with DAPI(Invitrogen).

c) Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Whole brain homogenates and cultured primary neurons after 4 weeks ofculture (see below Example 7) of WT and Trpm4^(−/−) mice were analyzedby quantitative Real-Time PCR for TRMP4 expression. RNA was purified byTRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and cDNA synthesis was performed withRevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas) accordingto the manufacturers' protocols. For quantitative Real-Time PCRTaqManGene Expression Assays Mm00613159_ml (Trpm4) and Mm99999915_gl (Gapdh)were used with a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (all AppliedBiosystems). ΔCT values were calibrated to whole brain cDNA of WT mice.

Results: Trpm4 mRNA was detected by quantitative real-time PCR of Trpm4of transcripts from WT and Trpm4^(−/−) whole brain homogenates andcompared with the Trpm4 mRNA in E16 hippocampal neurons after 4 weeks ofculture (FIG. 3c ). An increased number of transcripts was found incultured hippocampal neurons (FIG. 3c ), while no signal was detectablein Trpm4-deficient neurons. In addition, TRPM4 expression was recordedby immunohistochemistry in spinal cord motor neurons in WT, but not inTrpm4^(−/−) mice (representative immunohistochemical stainings aredepicted in FIG. 3a ). Similarly, motor neurons of spinal cord autopsyfrom human patients with MS were labelled by immunohistochemistry withan antibody against human TRPM4 (FIG. 3a ).

FIG. 3b shows co-localizations between TRPM4 and phosphorylated andnonphosphorylated neurofilament H (SMI 31 and SMI 32) in cervical spinalcord sections of healthy WT (upper panels) and in acutely inflamedlesions of WT EAE mice (middle panels; day 14 post immunization; scalebars: 50 um and inset 3 um) as well as TRPM4 and neurofilaments inperiplaque white matter lesions of MS patients (lower panels; scalebars: 50 μm and inset 12 μm). TRPM4 immunoreactivity was observed withinaxonal processes at the edge of EAE lesions in WT mice in contrast toaxons of healthy WT animals and Trpm4^(−/−) mice (representativeimmunohistochemical stainings in FIG. 3b , data for Trpm4^(−/−) notshown). Equally, TRPM4-positive axons were identified in affected spinalcords of MS patients in the periplaque white matter (representativeimmunohistochemical stainings in FIG. 3b ) and a substantial fraction ofaxons in the periplaque white matter of MS brain lesions as well ascortical neurons were labelled by TRPM4 antibodies (data not shown).However, no change was detected in TRPM4 expression in neuronal somatain the inflammatory vicinity in mice and humans (data not shown).Together these data provide evidence that TRPM4 is physiologicallyexpressed within the neuronal soma and in a fraction of axons ofdiseased EAE mice and MS patients, which suggest a contribution of TRPM4to inflammation-induced neuronal and axonal degeneration.

Example 6: Reduced Axonal/Neuronal Injury in Trpm4^(−/−) Mice

Since TRPM4 expression patterns suggested an involvement in axonal andneuronal injury mechanisms, it was tested whether the observedameliorated EAE phenotype of Trpm4^(−/−) mice was reflected in axonalimmunohistochemical studies. For this purpose, histopathologicalanalysis of EAE tissue was performed on PFA-fixed cross-sections (8 to10 per animal) of lumbar and thoracic spinal cords. Digital images oftissue sections were recorded at 200-fold magnification using ZeissMIRAX MIDI Slide Scanner (Carl Zeiss, Microlmaging GmbH, Germany).Numbers of inflammatory foci per spinal cord cross sections werequantified on hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained sections and theaverage of inflammatory foci per analyzed cross-sections are expressedas inflammatory index. The extent of demyelination was quantified bymeasuring the demyelinated area of LFB/PAS-stained sections using aMirax Viewer (Carl Zeiss, MicroImaging GmbH, Germany). The area ofdemyelination was calculated as percentage of total analyzed area ofwhite matter within a given section. Immunostaining for the amyloidprecursor protein (APP, clone 22C11, Chemicon) was used as a marker ofacute axonal damage. Mice were also stained for neurofilaments (SMI 31and SMI 32) in the corticospinal tract and dorsal column and forneuronal nuclei (NeuN) in the gray matter of cervical spinal cordsections (FIG. 4b ). Further immunostaining was performed to assessinfiltrates of activated macrophages/microglia (MAC3, Clone M3/84, BPPharmingen) and T cells (CD3, Clone CD3-12, AbDSerotec). Avidin-biotintechnique with 3,3-diaminobenzidine was used for the visualization ofbound primary antibodies. The average density of activatedmacrophages/microglia and T cells was analyzed automatically applying acustom-programmed script in Cognition Network Language based on theDefiniens Cognition Network Technology® platform (Definiens Developer XDsoftware). Briefly, the programmed script first discriminates betweentissue and background (no tissue) by spectral difference detection.Subsequently, the area of detected tissue (region of interest, ROI) iscalculated and immunostained cells (CD3 or Mac3, respectively) withinthis ROI are detected based on their dark brown color. To split cellsthat were localized in dense clusters into single cells, nuclei weredetected based on their blue color in Hemalaun counterstaining. Onlyimmunoreactive brown structures displaying a blue nucleus in the centerwere further classified as “cells”. APP-positive axons within whitematter spinal cord sections were measured using an ocular counting gridand expressed as APP⁺spheroids/mm².

Results: Trpm4^(−/−) mice showed reduced axonal and neuronal loss duringEAE (FIG. 4). Indeed, fewer axonal spheroids were observed byimmunostaining against amyloid precursor protein (APP), an acute injurymarker for axons, within EAE lesions in Trpm4-deficient animals incomparison to WT animals at day 21 post immunization (dpi) (n=8 for WTand n=5 for Trpm4^(−/−); P<0.05; FIG. 4a ). Consequently, there was amarked preservation of axons in the corticospinal tract (P<0.01) anddorsal column (P<0.01) as well as of neuronal cell bodies in the graymatter of the spinal cord (P<0.05) of Trpm4^(−/−)-EAE mice in comparisonto WT-EAE mice in immunohistochemical analyses at day 60 postimmunization (representative images in FIG. 4b ; WT-control (n=4), WTEAE (60 dpi; n=10), Trpm4^(−/−)-control (n=4) and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE (60dpi; n=9); Scale bars: 10 μm (corticospinal tract and dorsal column) and50 μm (gray matter)). These results indicate a profound resistance ofaxons and neurons in Trpm4^(−/−) mice towards hostile inflammatorychallenges leading to a neuro-axonal preservation and less clinicaldisability.

Example 7 Excitotoxic Cell Death is Driven by TRPM4-Dependent InwardCurrents a) Resistance Towards Neurotoxic Challenges In Vitro

It was tested whether the increased neuro-axonal preservation inTrpm4-deficient mice can be explained by a resistance towards ATPdepletion and glutamate-mediated Ca²⁺ influx in vitro. For this purpose,experiments were conducted with cells obtained from neuronal cellculture. Briefly, on day 16 after mating of Trpm4^(−/−) mice, pregnantfemales were sacrificed by CO₂. The embryos were taken out anddecapitated separately followed by dissection and dissociation of thehippocampus. In addition, a separate piece of tissue was taken forgenotyping. Subsequently, the cells were plated at a density of 1×10⁵cells in 24-well plates with neurobasal medium supplemented withL-glutamine, B-27 and penicillin/streptomycin (all Invitrogen). Threedays after culturing ARAC (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to avoidproliferation of glial cells.

After 4 weeks of culture experimental challenges were added (FIG. 5a ).To examine the cell integrity, LDH concentrations were measured in thesupernatant according to the manufacturers' protocol (Roche) fromuntreated and stressed neurons by ELISA (VICTOR², Wallac) 2, 4 and 6 hafter addition of 50 nM glutamate (Invitrogen), 300 μM H₂O₂(Sigma-Aldrich) or 0.5 μM antimycin A (Sigma-Aldrich) (FIG. 5a ). Thepercentages of damaged cells were calculated by setting 2% Triton X-100treated cells as 100%. ATP levels of neuronal cells after treatment witheither glutamate or antimycin A were quantified from cell lysates byusing a luciferin based ATP determination kit (Molecular Probes) after 4h of antimycin A or glutamate administration.

Immunocytochemistry of treated and control neurons was performed byfixing cells with 4% PFA for 30 min at room temperature andpermeabilizing them with ice cold 80% methanol for 6 min. The cells werestained simultaneously or consecutively overnight at 4° C. with thefollowing antibodies: TRPM4 (rabbit IgG, 1:100, Abcam) and β-tubulin III(mouse IgG, 1:500, Sigma-Aldrich). Secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor488-coupled donkey antibodies recognizing rabbit IgG, Cy3-coupled goatantibodies recognizing mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 488-coupled donkeyantibodies recognizing mouse IgG and Alexa Fluor 488-coupled goatantibodies recognizing mouse IgG (all 1:600, Dianova). Actin filamentswere stained with Alexa Fluor 555-coupled phalloidin (Invitrogen) andDNA with Hoechst 33258 (Invitrogen). The cell volumes of untreatedneuronal cells (10 days in culture) and the cell volumes of the cellswhich were treated with 50 nM glutamate for 2 h were assessed bystaining the cytoskeleton with β-tubulin III and Alexa Fluor 488-coupleddonkey anti-mouse antibodies. Z-stack images of whole neuronal cellswere taken with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP2)with a defined step size. The cell bodies were rearranged with Imarissoftware (bitplane) and the complete volumes were calculated by ImageJsoftware.

Results: Treatment of cultured hippocampal neurons with ATP-depleting(antimycin A) and calcium-dependent excitotoxic (glutamate) stimuliresulted in a time-dependent loss of cell integrity of WT neuronalcells, as measured by LDH release into the supernatant, while cells fromTrpm4^(−/−) mice remained largely unaffected by both stimuli (2 h,P<0.05; 4 and 6 h, P<0.01 for antimycin A; 2, 4 and 6 h, P<0.01 forglutamate; FIG. 5a ). Interestingly, glutamate treatment led to an evenmore profound reduction of cytosolic ATP levels than antimycin A (allP<0.01; FIG. 5b ), while cytosolic ATP levels of WT and Trpm4^(−/−) micewere comparable in all experimental conditions. Consistently, reductionof ATP by glucose deprivation resulted in a similar protection ofTrpm4^(−/−) neurons (6 h, P<0.01; data not shown).

b) Influence of Glutamate on TRPM4-Mediated Cation Currents

Since a marked resistance of Trpm4^(−/−) neurons againstglutamate-induced excitotoxicity was observed and additionally asubstantial reduction of neuronal ATP levels was detected under theseconditions, it was then examined whether neuronal TRPM4-mediated cationcurrents are activated by glutamate treatment. For this, whole-cellpatch-clamp recordings were performed with an EPC9 patch-clamp amplifier(HEKA Elektronik) at a sampling rate of 20 kHz. Patch electrodes had aDC resistance between 2 and 4 MΩ when filled with intracellular solutionfor whole-cell patches. An Ag—AgCl wire was used as a referenceelectrode. Capacitance and access resistance were monitoredcontinuously, and cell membrane capacitance values were used tocalculate current densities. Bath solution was composed of 156 mM NaCl,5 mM CaCl₂, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM HEPES at pH 7.4. The pipettesolution contained 156 mM CsCl, 1 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM EGTA and 10 mM HEPESat pH 7.2. Free Ca²⁺ in the pipette solution was 7.4 μM by addition ofCaCl₂. Holding potential was 0 mV, and current traces were elicited byvoltage ramps for 250 ms from −120 to +100 mV. During all recordings,100 nM TTX (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1μM nifedipine (Sigma-Aldrich) were addedto the bath solution.

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed on hippocampal neuronsof E16 embryos from WT and Trpm4^(−/−) mice after 10 days in cultureunder resting conditions (untreated) and after administration of 50 nMglutamate for 2 h. Normalized current-voltage relationship for WT(untreated, n=11; glutamate incubation, n=7) and Trpm4^(−/−) (untreated,n=9; glutamate incubation, n=7) cells obtained from 250 ms voltage rampsmeasured in the whole-cell patch-clamp configuration from −120 to +100mV are shown. Holding potential was 0 mV. In parallel, hippocampalneurons of E16 embryos from WT (n=7) and Trpm4^(−/−) (n=7) mice werecultured for 10 days. Glutamate treated and control cells were stainedfor their cytoskeleton by β-tubulin III. Z-stacks of whole neuronalcells were taken with a confocal laser-scanning microscope and cellvolumes were calculated. Representative pictures of neuronal cells fromWT and Trpm4^(−/−) mice after glutamate incubation for 2 h are shown(FIG. 5d : Scale bar 30 μm).

Results: Under resting conditions no differences in current densitybetween hippocampal neurons from Trpm4^(−/−) and WT mice were detectedby whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. Strikingly, however, afterincubation of the cells with glutamate, WT neurons showed a strongTRPM4-dependent inward current at negative potentials which was absentin Trpm4^(−/−) neurons (FIG. 5c ). During electrophysiologicalmeasurements, an increased cell capacity of glutamate-treated WT neuronscompared to untreated neurons was additionally detected, while thisincrease was absent Trpm4^(−/−) neurons (P<0.05; FIG. 5d ). Since a gainin capacity can reflect an increase in cell volume, we analyzed the cellsize of neurons from Trpm4^(−/−) and WT mice under resting conditionsand after glutamate treatment in immunofluorescent stainings of thecytoskeleton. In agreement with the observed gain in capacity, the cellvolume of glutamate-treated WT neurons increased substantially comparedto untreated WT neurons (P<0.01). By contrast, glutamate-treatedTrpm4^(−/−) neurons showed similar cell volumes in treated and untreatedconditions (FIG. 5e ).

Together, these results indicate that TRPM4 ion channels can exertneuronal injury in the context of energy deficiency and excitotoxicglutamate stimulation, and that TRPM4-mediated inward currents aresubstantially increased after this stimulation with subsequent oncoticcell swelling and neuronal cell death. As both conditions, ATP depletiondue to mitochondrial dysfunction and substantially increased glutamateconcentrations are abundant phenomena in EAE and MS lesions (Campbell etal. (2011), Ann Neurol. 69: 481-492), it has to be concluded that apathological activation of TRPM4 occurs in EAE and MS. The resultsfurther imply that a TRPM4-dependent excessive Na⁺ overload eventuallycauses oncotic cell swelling and neuronal cell death.

Example 8 Glibenclamide Reduces EAE Severity by TRPM4 Inhibition

Having established a decisive role of TRPM4 for neuro-axonaldegeneration under neuroinflammatory conditions, it was next examinedwhether pharmacological inhibition of TRPM4 after EAE induction is ableto exert a neuroprotective effect in vivo. Glibenclamide, awell-tolerated, FDA-approved oral antidiabetic drug, has been reportedto effectively inhibit TRPM4 (Damien et al. (2007), Cardiovasc Res. 73:531-538; Becerra et al. (2011), Cardiovasc Res. 91: 677-684). Theinfluence of this drug was tested in groups of WT-EAE andTrpm4^(−/−)-EAE mice. WT EAE and Trpm4^(−/−) EAE mice were treated asdescribed in Example 1 above to determine mean clinical disabilityscores. Pharmacological blockade of TRPM4 was achieved by dailyadministration of 10 μg glibenclamide or DMSO control by intraperitonealinjections after onset of first clinical symptoms (n=8 forTrpm4^(−/−)+glibenclamide; for all other groups n=6). 25 mgglibenclamide (Sigma-Aldrich) were solved in 5 ml dimethylsulfoxid(DMSO, AppliChem) every day, and 200 μl of this solution were diluted in9.8 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Treatment was started when firstclinical symptoms occurred (day 8 after immunization with MOG₃₅₋₅₅).Mice received 100 μl of this solution or 2% DMSO in PBS as control. Dueto the higher burden of daily injections, mice that were treated withglibenclamide or DMSO-control received only 2 mg/ml M tuberculosis and100 ng pertussis toxin for EAE immunization. Healthy WT mice (WTcontrol) and WT EAE mice treated either with glibenclamide or vehicle(n=4 per group) were stained 30 days post immunization forneurofilaments (SMI 31 and SMI 32) in the corticospinal tract and dorsalcolumn and for neuronal nuclei (NeuN) in the gray matter of cervicalspinal cord sections as described above. Numbers of axons and somatawere counted by ImageJ software.

Results: The results obtained from the glibenclamide study are shown inFIG. 6. Glibenclamide treatment reduces clinical disability andneurodegeneration in EAE mice. While glibenclamide ameliorateddisability in WT EAE mice in comparison to vehicle control treated WTEAE animals (P<0.05), glibenclamide showed no additional clinicalimprovement in Trpm4^(−/−) EAE mice, indicating that glibenclamideexerts its protective properties in EAE via targeting TRPM4. This wassubstantiated by a preservation of axons in the corticospinal tract(P<0.01) and dorsal column (P<0.05) of glibenclamide treated WT EAE micein comparison to vehicle control treated WT EAE mice. Further, neuronalcell body loss in the gray matter of the spinal cord in WT EAE mice(P<0.05) was slightly diminished by glibenclamide treatment incomparison to vehicle control treated mice, although this preservationof neurons did not reach statistical significance (FIG. 6b ).

1. A method of treating Multiple Sclerosis in a subject, comprisingadministering to a subject that suffers from Multiple Sclerosis atherapeutically effective amount of a compound which is effective ininhibiting the function of a TRPM4 ion channel and inhibits or reducesaxonal injury in the subject.
 2. The method according to claim 1,wherein the compound is selected from the group consisting ofglibenclamide, 9-phenanthrol, tolbutamide, repaglinide, nateglinide,meglitinide, midaglizole, LY397364, LY389382, glyclazide, glimepiride,estrogen, estradiol, estrone, estriol, genistein, non-steroidalestrogen, phytoestrogen, zearalenone,5-butyl-7-chloro-6-hydroxybenzo[c]-quinolizium chloride, flufenamicacid, and spermine.
 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein thecompound is to be administered in an amount from 1.0 μg/kg body weightto 5,000 μg/kg body weight.
 4. The method according to claim 1, whereinthe compound is administered in an amount from 100 μg/kg body weight to800 μg/kg body weight.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein thecompound is administered in an amount from 300 μg/kg body weight to 600μg/kg body weight.
 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein thecompound is administered orally, via intravenous injection, or viaintravenous infusion.
 7. A method of treating Multiple Sclerosis in asubject, comprising administering to a subject that suffers fromMultiple Sclerosis a pharmaceutical composition comprising atherapeutically effective amount of a compound which is effective ininhibiting the function of a TRPM4 ion channel and inhibits or reducesaxonal injury in the subject.
 8. The method according to claim 7, whichfurther comprises at least one excipient, diluent, carrier and/or atleast one additional pharmaceutically active compound which is useful inthe treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.
 9. The method according to claim 7,wherein the compound is selected from the group consisting ofglibenclamide, 9-phenanthrol, tolbutamide, repaglinide, nateglinide,meglitinide, midaglizole, LY397364, LY389382, glyclazide, glimepiride,estrogen, estradiol, estrone, estriol, genistein, non-steroidalestrogen, phytoestrogen, zearalenone,5-butyl-7-chloro-6-hydroxybenzo[c]-quinolizium chloride, flufenamicacid, and spermine.
 10. The method according to claim 7, furthercomprising administering one or more other anti-neurodegenerative oranti-inflammatory compounds selected from the group consisting ofinterferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, fampridine, fingolimodhydrochloride, natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, and mitoxantrone. 11.The method according to claim 10, wherein said otheranti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory compound is administered ina pharmaceutical composition that is separate from said pharmaceuticalcomposition comprising said compound which is effective in inhibitingthe function of a TRPM4 ion.
 12. The method according to claim 10,wherein said other anti-neurodegenerative or anti-inflammatory compoundand said compound which is effective in inhibiting the function of aTRPM4 ion are administered according to a weekly dosing regimen.
 13. Invitro method for identifying a pharmaceutically active compound fortreating or preventing a neurodegenerative disease in a subject,comprising: (a) contacting a candidate compound with a functional TRPM4ion channel; and (b) detecting whether said candidate compoundinterferes with a function of the TRPM4 ion channel or decreasestranscription of the TRPM4 gene and/or the translation of the TRPM4mRNA; wherein a compound which inhibits the function of the TRPM4 ionchannel or decreases the transcription of the TRPM4 gene and/or thetranslation of the TRPM4 mRNA is suitable for treating or preventingsaid neurodegenerative disease.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein saidneurodegenerative disease is associated with glutamate excitotoxicity.15. The method of claim 13, wherein said neurodegenerative disease isMultiple Sclerosis.
 16. A polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequenceshown in SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:2 or a variant thereof having at least80% sequence identity to the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1 orSEQ ID NO:2; or a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide comprising theamino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:2 or a variantthereof having at least 80% sequence identity to the amino acid sequenceshown in SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:2, or the complement thereof foridentifying a pharmaceutically active compound for treating orpreventing a neurodegenerative disease.
 17. The polypeptide orpolynucleotide of claim 16, wherein said neurodegenerative disease isMultiple Sclerosis.